WJMC Day 3: Field Visits

Today, we visited the International Spy Museum. I had high expectations because I had heard that that site was one of the most interesting and engaging. The museum was extremely large and had so many exciting experiences that I didn’t have the time nor energy for all of them! Once I exited the exhibition, I headed down to the gift shop where I bought a plushie, a lipstick pen, a sticker, and present for my mom’s birthday.

Later, we went back to the GMU campus to listen to the news anchor Andrias White Murdaugh give a speech. She was one of the most lively speakers I had seen this week. She asked us a few questions and afterwards I was able to ask her one of my own questions and even got a photo with her. The question I asked her was whether someone should go more towards things they are good at or things that they love. She told me to continue testing the waters and trying different things to see what works for me and then building off that. I really enjoyed how much she encouraged us to go out of our comfort zones and do things we’re unsure of.

During the Career Exploration Sessions, I was able to hear the speaker Richard Todd Stafford and I also got to meet with Buzz McClain, Assad Khan, and Nadgeena Jerome afterwards. It was interesting to get information and advice from them about careers in entertainment and music as well as how to network. I especially loved all the information in Mr. Stafford’s talk about communications and the many medias one can do when getting into communications. I also got a picture with Nadgeena Jerome!

Here are some photos from day 3 of WJMC:

WJMC Day 2: Monument Tour

Today, I had to wake up very early to shower even though I got back to my dorm at 10:30 the night before and basically went to sleep at 11:00. To some that may not seem that bad, but for someone who has a strict sleep schedule of 10 PM to 6 AM, it was a bit disheartening to know I wouldn’t be getting as much sleep as I would at home. However, I am only staying here for 5 days, so I have nothing to worry about.

We got on the bus after our color group meeting to drive to a pizza place for lunch. I was able to go to a store with one of my friends to buy some essentials. Afterwards, we got on the bus again and went to listen to a couple of speakers, Tom Jackman and Anna Layden. I was not able to speak with Tom Jackman, but I was able to ask Anna Layden “when it comes to drawing vs. photography, which do you think is better at telling a story?”. She told me that both are completely different and that she believes that it depends on what story is being covered. I also reached out to her on Instagram so I am waiting to see if she will respond.

We went to eat dinner around 5:30 PM before heading to tour a monument. We passed the Washington Monument and the National Museum of African American History and Culture. We got to look around the World War II Memorial and saw the Lincoln Memorial. We also looked around the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial. Then we headed back to the dorms.

Here are some pictures from day 2 at WJMC:

WJMC Day 1: Arrival

I have finally arrived at WJMC! I’m so excited! I was initially so nervous about being so far from home by myself and not knowing anyone here, but I am now confident that I will make many new friends. I even got to know someone who lived near my town!

I started typing this in my dorm room, getting ready to head over to The Hub to meet more people and play games. It is a bit hot outside, but I really want to get my steps in! I want to see if I can get to 10,000 each day of this conference since I heard that we would be doing a lot of walking. I played Pump It Up, which is a bit like Dance Dance Revolution. I chose VERY NICE by SEVENTEEN since they had a lot of K-pop songs.

I did a tour of the WJMC campus at 3:30 PM. It was nice to see the many reasons why someone would like to come to George Mason University. Later on, I met with my color group and we learned more about each other and were also able to ask questions that dispelled our fears and worries about this conference.

Lastly, we had the opening dinner with a speaker named Savannah Behrmann who is a Senate Correspondent for National Journal. Many of my peers were able to ask her questions but I did not because I couldn’t think of any in time…

The first day was very interesting, and I met a lot of new and interesting people, so I am excited for what the next day has in store for us.

Here are some pictures from my day 1 at WJMC :

I didn’t know if my friend or her parents were comfortable with her facing being posted, so I censored her for safety.

Park Seonghwa (ATEEZ)

This is an art project I did for my intro to visual arts class. We were only supposed to draw half the face, but once I was done with the assignment I decided to draw the rest of the reference I used. I think I did a good job, but I still wish to work on drawing realistically since parts of this drawing still look cartoon-ish. I think it also looks weird to me because I drew the different sides of his face at different times. I am still impressed with myself, though!

WJMC Day 0: Preparation

I am attending the 2nd session of the Washington Journalism and Media Conference this July from the 14th to the 19th. I am super excited as I have never attended a conference like this before. Before then, I had been pondering a lot about what I wanted to do once I graduated. I had it in my mind that I would go on to become a famous musician, author, artist, actor, and so on. However, I did not know if I had anything to fuel my endeavors as a rising musician, author, artist, or actor usually struggles to make ends meet until they make their big break. So, because of my passion for writing, I believe that being a journalist would be the best career for me, as I also have a love for learning about new things, even if they have nothing to do with the arts. At first, I was nervous about going to the conference as I was still unsure of what path I wanted to take in my life, but with the reassurance of my family, I am confident that I will have an amazing time at the Washington Journalism and Media Conference. During the week of the conference, I will post short recaps of what I have experienced during each day, along with pictures (if I remember to take them lol).

Reading List

Months before, we were given a reading list of materials we could read to prepare ourselves for the conference. We weren’t expected to read all of the books, so the 3 books I had chosen to read were Trailblazer by Dorothy Butler Gilliam, Smart Brevity by Jim Vandhei, and We Say #NeverAgain, which was written by the student journalists of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. Getting to read these books inspired me to get back into the habit of reading and to look at writing both in journalism and in my daily life from different perspectives.

Trailblazer

Trailblazer follows the life of Dorothy Butler Gilliam, the first black female reporter for The Washington Post. She talks about the struggles she faced as a black female reporter and her strong desire to diversify the stories shown in the media and those working in the news. She also talks about the way events in her personal life had affected the way she saw the world and how her views changed over time. For example, she speaks about once when she was in her youth she wrote that the desegregation of public spaces should be done slowly, but as she grew intellectually, she realized that she was wrong and that Black Americans and other non-white groups of people should not have to wait to get the freedom and privelages that every white person in the United States was born with at that time. This book inspired me not just to speak out about what I believe in, but to also see that just being open to different points of view can broaden your horizons even if you’re not traveling the world.

Smart Brevity

Smart Brevity told less of a story but gave me a lot of insights about text structure that I want to integrate into my writing, both for my blog and my personal writing, like texts and emails. I liked that the book took its own advice and wasn’t very chunky or hard to understand. I also appreciated that it used examples of what to do and what not to do, whether you’re writing emails, social media posts, or using smart brevity in you’re work or business. Funny enough, this book also reminded me to read over my writing before posting it.

We Say #NeverAgain

We Say #NeverAgain tells the story of the student journalists within the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School newspaper, The Eagle Eye. In the beginning, I was hesitant to read this book as it covers the tragic shooting that occurred on February 14, 2018, at Marjory Stoneman Douglas. Even so, reading the book gave me some interesting insights into student journalism and also how extreme media attention can be both empowering and anxiety-inducing. The student journalists explain essential aspects of journalism, such as how one can remain objective when reporting, the dos and don’ts of interviewing, and the reasons why one should use their voice to make a change. They also cover how the shooting and the recognition by the media they received afterwards affected them in their daily lives and their reporting. One part that stuck with me was how they chose not to mention the shooter’s name to not give the shooter the notoriety that he desired, even though many large news publishers had done so already. Though the shooting left them changed forever, it also inspired them to become brave activists and incredible journalists.

The other 2 books I desired to read were Connie: A Memoir by Connie Chung and She Said by Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey, but they were not available at my library. Still, I hope to read them in the future.

The Evolution of Poetry – Survey of Poetry Honors Project (5/23/24)

Poetry was originally an oral art. Poetry was passed on through songs and spoken words. Poetry recited history and stories of gods at social gatherings and festivals. Poems were long and rhythmic tales that lived on through generations of repetition. Poets stopped using oral poetry and began pursuing written poetry so they could appeal more to the eye than to the ear. The earliest forms of written poetry are said to have originated in Africa. Throughout time, poetry was put on paper, then in books, then on blogs. However, oral poetry is still alive today through performance poetry like slam poetry.  

Though not much can be said about how people viewed poetry a long time ago, a lot can be said about how poetry is viewed today. People see poetry as a way of conveying emotions and connecting with strangers. There is even research that shows that people who read poetry have more engaging social lives than people who do not. Many believe that we would have a better society if people read poetry more often. 

Poetry has had many influences. One of the first named poets was a Mesopotamian known as Enheduanna. Though not much is known about her, we do know that she would write poems and edit hymnals. Unfortunately, the first known poems were anonymous. These poems include Rig Vedas of Hinduism, Song of the Weaver, and Epic of Gilgamesh. Some early influencers of poetry were Homer, Ralph Waldo Emerson, and Emily Dickinson. Homer wrote the famous epics, “The Iliad” and “The Odyssey,” which were part of the foundations of Greek literature. Ralph Waldo Emerson is known for being an incredible essayist with one of his most well-known essays being “Self-Reliance.” Emily Dickinson became famous years after her death because her sister began publishing her poems. One of the most well-known and most influential poets of all time was Shakespeare. Shakespeare influenced poetry through his most famous works like “Hamlet,” “Romeo and Juliet,” and “A Midsummer Night’s Dream.” Many of his works are still being performed and studied today. 

Now, in the age of contemporary poetry, poetry has become more accessible. Not just because of the invention of the printing press but also because poems can now be posted online. Poetry being posted on blogs and websites can help contemporary poets gain more attention than through publishing books. Poetry has also been used to reflect people’s cultures and experiences. For example, “Telephone Conversation” by the Nigerian poet, Wole Soyinka, is a humorous take on a significant issue in which Soyinka describes himself as “brunette” in the face but the soles of his feet and palms of his hands are “peroxide blond.” Another great poet, Okot P’Bitek, wrote “Song of Lawino” which is regarded as one of the best modern epic poems. The poem goes over how Western culture has affected African culture. Another popular modern poet is Shonto Begay who has written many works on the culture and struggles of Native Americans. Many of the poet Rupi Kaur’s critically acclaimed collections reflect trauma, healing, femininity, and so much more that is going on in the modern world. Since the beginning of poetry, it has never ceased to express and reflect on the struggles of the world and its people. 

Though poetry has gone through many struggles with people sacrificing authenticity and honesty for the possibility of becoming a famous poet or only become famous after their death, poetry is going strong and is even being encouraged in academic environments. Poetry is not just seen as something corny or romantic but also like painting with words. 

Bibliography

Raab, Diana. “How Poetry Changed since the Time We Went to School.” Sixty and Me, 5 Apr. 2022, https://sixtyandme.com/how-poetry-changed-since-the-time-we-went-to-school/. Accessed 22 May 2024. 

Atwell, Margot. “Poetry, in the Wilds of the Internet.” Kickstarter Magazine, 2 May 2016, https://medium.com/kickstarter/why-poetry-is-thriving-online-cb190cad5e2a. Accessed 22 May 2024. 

National Museum of the American Indian. “Native Knowledge 360°—Celebrating Native Cultures through Words: Storytelling and Oral Traditions.” Americanindian.si.edu, https://americanindian.si.edu/nk360/informational/storytelling-and-oral-traditions. Accessed 22 May 2024. 

“10 Famous Poets Who Left an Indelible Mark on Literature.” Biography, 26 Sept. 2023, www.biography.com/authors-writers/g45226269/famous-poets. Accessed 22 May 2024. 

Foundation, Poetry. “WHO CARES about POETRY? 90 PERCENT of AMERICAN READERS, NEW STUDY SHOWS.” Poetry Foundation, 28 Sept. 2021, www.poetryfoundation.org/foundation/press/71608/who-cares-about-poetry-90-percent-of-american-readers-new-study-shows. Accessed 22 May 2024. 

Ingrid. “Poetics: Oral Poetry.” DVerse, 31 Aug. 2021, https://dversepoets.com/2021/08/31/poetics-oral-poetry/. Accessed 22 May 2024. 

286135448514984. The Evolution of Poetry – from Oral to Visual. 25 Aug. 2022, https://penwings.com/the-evolution-of-poetry-from-oral-to-visual/. Accessed 22 May 2024.  

Reflection (3/24/25)

Initially, I had known that poetry was an oral art before its transition was made. I knew a lot about poetry before I wrote this essay. It was still fun to learn more and to even find poems such as Telephone Conversation by Wole Soyinka. I also learned more about the poet Rupi Kaur through my research for this essay and I am really liking her work!

OVER TRACK Album Review/Analysis

This is the first album I have ever listened to from NTX, formerly NT9. With this in mind, I believe this album is extremely underappreciated. 🚨

This may be the first time I’ve found such a great album from a group with monthly streams that aren’t in the millions. I originally heard the title track for this album, “Over N Over”, in the car with my sister. I thought it was a great song and was surprised it had come out so recently, with the vibes reminding me of a 3rd or 2nd-generation K-pop group. The album has 11 songs, including the English version of the title track, and is about 34 minutes and 22 seconds long.

With NTX, I have seen a few people complain about having a discography that sounds very undecorated, with releases that sound similar to the last ones. I disagree with this statement, but I also haven’t been a fan of them for very long. I have also seen other people say that “Over N Over” tries to use the success of the 2nd/3rd-generation style to gain more attention. I do not completely disagree, but I also believe that many K-pop groups take from older generations, just not in K-pop. I personally would love to see more 2nd/3rd-generation-esque concepts/songs in K-pop like UNIS’ “SWICY”.

About the Title Track

Anyways, the title track, “Over N Over”, is a youthful upbeat anthem with its lyrics meant to represent a young person looking to escape the trials of society and just have fun with friends. What further drew me in was its instrumental, which is reminiscent of “Safe and Sound” by Capital Cities (at least in my ears). It is very coming-of-age and is what drew me to listen to the rest of the album. However, I understand why one might want the song to be a few seconds longer. The song is above the average K-pop song length at 3 minutes and 31 seconds, yet it still seems it needs more to feel complete. Despite the song’s length, it does not contain a bridge or even a loud ending chorus like in “FANTASTIC BABY” by BIGBANG. In my opinion, that final part is exactly what this song was lacking. Still, I don’t think the lack of a final part should be the reason that people condemn this song or the album.

The B-Sides

I am honestly surprised that many people have said that the album is “boring” as I found it quite tasteful with songs sounding genuinely pleasing. The first song, “SCOOT,” and a few others do use instrumental and chant choruses, but not in a way that makes them sound plain or uninteresting. One of the songs, “Sir”, really grabbed my attention with its change-up in the middle of the song, which reminded me of NMIXX‘s usual niche and also the change-up in STRAY KIDS’ “S-Class”. It goes from an edgy sound to a faster “band in a garage” style with lots of Hip-hop inspiration.

The songs that didn’t use chant choruses (minus the title track, “Over N Over”), “STAY”, “Mind Box”, “Memories”, and “Take it easy” are not lengthy ballads like many K-pop groups like to include to “spice up” an album (I don’t mind long ballads, I really enjoy TEMPEST’s “Broken Record” for example). My favorite song from the album was “Mind Box”. I enjoyed listening to the chorus, and I also like how the lyrics illustrate the mind as a box which holds memories and remnants of someone the speaker is in love with. This is displayed with lyrics like “One day, suddenly I opened the box again and it was filled with you”. The speaker seems to hide their feeling because they feel like they may not meet their love again or lose them all together with the lyrics “There’s so much I want to say, but I’ll hold it in because only this way, I feel like I’ll meet you again” and “It’s okay if I spend the whole day missing you because as much as I think of you all night long that’s how much I cherish you”

Closing Remarks

There isn’t much else for me to say about this album besides the fact that the English version of the title track didn’t sound too different from the original song. Usually, a problem I have with English versions of K-pop songs is that the lyrics end up sounding “cringe”, but I feel like I could listen to the English version of the title track without noticing the difference between it and the original. Overall, I really liked this album and would definitely recommend this if I wanted to give you a good first impression of NTX!

Bibliography

“Genius English Translations – NTX – 마음상자 (Mind Box) (English Translation).” Genius, 2025, genius.com/Genius-english-translations-ntx-mind-box-english-translation-lyrics. Accessed 3 May 2025.

“OVER TRACK by NTX (엔티엑스).” Genius, 2025, genius.com/albums/Ntx/Over-track. Accessed 3 May 2025.

Book Ban – English I B Honors Project (3/21/24)

Since 1637, many books have been banned for reasons ranging from ludicrous to corrupt. Even some kids’ books have been nominated for removal. An example would be Little Red Riding Hood which was nominated for “violence.” Another would be Matilda by Roald Dahl which was nominated for “encouraging students to disobey their parents.” The book “The Hate U Give” was banned for “profanity,” “violence,” and “anti-police messages.” The Hunger Games was challenged for “violence,” “anti-family messages,” “anti-ethnic messages,” and “offensive language.” Obviously, one would have to read the books for themselves to really know if any of these accusations are true. Some of the reasons these books were banned or challenged were true and some were fabricated simply because someone did not like the book or had not seen it for what it really was. 

Most schools look for books that help students get better at reading, having their books get longer and more difficult to comprehend as they progress from one grade to the next. Of course, they also need to be appropriate and send a good message to the students and their developing brains. However, they also need to give students the space to think and develop their own opinions in addition to learning about others. With this in mind, how would one go about defining a criterion for good schoolbooks? I think it would be best to ask students and teachers. This way, we can learn what kind of books students like to read and what books teachers think would enlighten students best about literacy. We could also involve parents so that they can include what kinds of books they would be comfortable with their children reading. Still, some parents may be stricter in what they would like their children to read, which may cause division and could also hinder the collection of the kinds of books that children like to read and learn from. 

Organizations like “Moms for Liberty” consist of parents who try to get books banned from schools. These organizations often create major censorship within schools which is why kids are being deprived of critical thinking. Some parents think that these books will be bad influences on their children, causing them to rebel or change their current beliefs. Even though the parents mean well, these book bans are taking away from their child’s learning experiences. When growing up, only viewing things from one perspective may cause kids to not be able to distinguish right or wrong on their own and they may have to only rely on the standards set for them even if those standards are wrong.  

Even though we should hear from students, teachers, and parents, we should also hear from people of diverse backgrounds who may or may not have grown up with books of diverse viewpoints. Only hearing from one side of history will still cause books to not be varied because one side may be filled with different prejudices whether they are acknowledged or not. Getting the opinions of people of different races, genders, and nationalities will give more input on different situations which will help students to learn more about the world from different perspectives. Teachers can help facilitate discussion around these sensitive topics by establishing classroom norms that encourage open-mindedness, empathy, and respectful conversations. They should create a safe space where students feel comfortable expressing their opinions and engaging in constructive debates without fear of judgment. Allowing students to have these discussions can help with students’ critical thinking since they can hear about the opinions of their peers. 

Students should be allowed to hear about different opinions and situations so they can learn how to think freely and view the world differently. If students only get to read certain books about certain topics, they’ll never truly learn about the world around them. Censoring books is a crime against education and banning a book needs a better reason than because of “violence” present within its pages. 

Bibliography

Waldman, Katy. “What Are We Protecting Children from by Banning Books?” The New Yorker, 10 Mar. 2023, www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/what-are-we-protecting-children-from-by-banning-books. Accessed 11 Mar. 2024. 

Andrew, Scottie. “Book Bans Are Surging — and Taking an Emotional Toll on Many Authors.” CNN, 4 Oct. 2023, www.cnn.com/2023/10/04/style/book-bans-sales-authors-impact-cec/index.html. Accessed 11 Mar. 2024. 

PEN America. “School Book Bans: The Mounting Pressure to Censor.” PEN America, 21 Sept. 2023, www.pen.org/report/book-bans-pressure-to-censor/. Accessed 11 Mar. 2024. 

Gilbard, Morgan. “What You Need to Know about the Book Bans Sweeping the U.S.” Teachers College – Columbia University, Columbia University, 6 Sept. 2023, www.tc.columbia.edu/articles/2023/september/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-book-bans-sweeping-the-us/. Accessed 11 Mar. 2024. 

Keller, Abigail. ““The Right Side of History”: North Carolina School Districts Face Book Challenges.” “The Right Side of History”: North Carolina School Districts Face Book Challenges, 10 Oct. 2023, www.dailytarheel.com/article/2023/10/city-book-bans-across-north-carolina. Accessed 11 Mar. 2024. 

Reflection

Writing this essay was very interesting. I have always wondered why books were being banned and I thought it was rather ridiculous. Through my sources, I have learned about the numerous books that have been banned and challenged including books I have grown up on like Matilda and Harry Potter. I still wonder what experiences I have missed out on because of the banning of books that may have been present in my school libraries. 

Why Are K-Pop Songs Getting Shorter?

I’m sure this is a phenomenon that most people are no stranger to. Most songs these days have gotten shorter and are usually less than 3 minutes long. This trend has resulted in many complaints from fans and has made it supernatural to see a K-pop song longer than 2 minutes and 59 seconds. Fortunately, there have been a few exceptions to this trend.

The Worst Trend

But why did the songs get shorter? For example, Tomorrow by Together is a group I like to listen to, and one of my favorite songs by them is “Fairy of Shampoo”, which is over 4 minutes long. However, Tomorrow by Together’s title tracks and songs in general have been getting shorter or half-baked. This isn’t a way for me to spread hate because I dislike a few songs. The entirety of their The Star Chapter: SANCTUARY EP features songs that are under 3 minutes long and are barely 2 minutes long. I genuinely had high hopes for the EP, but was disappointed to see that I would barely have time to enjoy it. Another example is Stray Kids. It seems as though their title tracks have been getting shorter and shorter ever since the release of their 5-STAR album. S-Class is 3 minutes and 15 seconds, “LALALALA” is 3 minutes and 2 seconds, “Chk Chk Boom” is 2 minutes and 28 seconds, and “Walkin’ on Water” is also 2 minutes and 28 seconds. This doesn’t include their Japanese GIANT album release, in which the title track is only 2 minutes and 58 seconds long. This trend does go beyond the groups I listen to.

For people who may not care or may not be fans of these artists, it may not seem like a big deal. Still, as someone who has enjoyed their music in the past, it hurts to look forward to a new release only to find that most of the songs are shorter than the blink of an eye. For example, in Le Sserafim’s HOT EP, most of the songs, including the title track, are less than 2 minutes and 40 seconds long, except for the song Ash, which is 3 minutes and 15 seconds long and may just be the best song on the album.

Short = Bad?

So why is this happening? Some blame greedy companies trying to make a quick buck, while others say it’s because there’s less time to prepare a fully developed song over 3 minutes. I feel like I should make a distinction. A song can be short and fully developed. That is because they are made short for a reason, but this can depend on a listener’s taste. A few short songs I don’t believe any added length are Red Velvet’s “Don’t U Wait No More”, SEVENTEEN’s “Clap (박수)”, and “Bite Back” by THE BOYZ. Even so, many short songs are not fully developed in my eyes. Take “Over the Moon” by Tomorrow by Together, for example. I really enjoy this song, but it deserves to be longer. It definitely deserved a bridge and more time to have an impact. Some may disagree on whether or not a song is fully developed, depending on whether or not they like the song. One might say that a song isn’t fully developed if it lacks a bridge or if it has a “lazy” chant chorus. I don’t believe that either of these is true because there a bridgeless songs (“Fantastic Baby” by BIGBANG, “BOOMBAYAH” by BLACKPINK, “Playground” by Kandis) and songs with chant choruses (“Guerilla” by ATEEZ, “Accendio” by IVE, “Imma Be” by XLOV, and many more, of course) that are fantastic! An underdeveloped song is a song that leaves one wanting more. Companies use this to gain more streams on a song in a shorter amount of time. This saddens me because imagine how many songs that have been released could have been the most magnificent thing to grace someone’s ears if they had only been a few seconds longer. Imagine what some of these 5th-generation groups could showcase with a song that’s 4 minutes long.

The Desire for More

To this day, many regard “Into The New World” by Girls’ Generation as one of the best K-pop debuts. With this, I completely agree. The song does make you want to listen to it more, but not because you wish it offered more. It gives you everything it wants to give, and you can enjoy it over and over again if you like. It’s fully developed with a gorgeous instrumental, bridge, and a sung chorus, and is 4 minutes and 25 seconds long. I understand that trends change over the years, as Girls’ Generation is from the 2nd generation, and we are currently in the 5th generation. Nonetheless, having shorter songs can hurt a group’s ability to express themselves creatively if a music video isn’t given the most creativity or if an album doesn’t feature songs that give it a real impact. Having a single featuring 2 songs, each being 2 minutes long, with music videos that aren’t meant to give some kind of message or be memorable in some way, is just so artless.

Closing Remarks

I guess that the reason I chose to write this essay is that I don’t see this topic talked about enough. I see some people comment on a music video, “I’m so happy this song is over 3 minutes long!” but I haven’t seen anyone discuss the problem directly or how it might be solved. At the beginning of the 5th generation, I saw this problem at its worst, especially with the groups from larger companies. Yet, I see this happening less with groups like ATEEZ, IVE, and THE BOYZ, who are not from a Big 4 company, as well as some 5th-generation groups. Now I know most people aren’t surprised that bigger companies are going to want more money, but it surprises me that smaller companies would focus more on quality instead of larger companies with 10 different groups to make them money, which allows them to spend more time developing a song. Maybe there isn’t a particular solution to this problem. Maybe it is slowly solving itself as some companies realize that fans won’t bite whatever is given to them. I’m excited to see what these 5th-generation groups can do with this realization.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started